In a WorldNetDaily <\/i>column of July 16, titled, \u201cWhy they won\u2019t let us talk to the illegal kids,\u201d talk radio pioneer Barry Farber suggested that, \u201cthe reason we in media are not allowed to talk to the children is that the conversation in every honest interview will get around to, \u2018What made you all risk so much to get here?\u2019 \u00a0The answer will be, \u2018Oh! \u00a0Mama and Papa heard it many times. \u00a0Your President Obama has found many little ways to say, \u2018Come on up! \u00a0We won\u2019t send you back!\u2019 \u201d<\/p>\n
Barry\u2019s very ominous prediction was that, \u201cThe minute that awareness reaches critical mass, Obama, his works, his team, and the Democratic Party will suffer a rejection that will make the Republican years in political purgatory seem like a quick tour-bus jaunt through hell.\u201d<\/p>\n
One of my major regrets is that, barring divine intervention, I will not be around to see how historians will chronicle America\u2019s post-constitutional period: the last half of the 20th<\/sup> century and the first 16 years of the 21st<\/sup> century.\u00a0 These are the years during which one of our major political parties, the Democrat Party, created an ideological plantation on which they cynically attempted to imprison an entire ethnic minority.<\/p>\n Rarely in human history has any civilized nation so offended basic human decency than did the United States during the era of slavery, between 1619 and the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in1861.\u00a0 In fact, many Americans found the institution of slavery to be so morally repugnant that a new political party, the Republican Party, was spawned out of the abolitionist movement.<\/p>\n The Republican Party was founded in a schoolhouse in Ripon, Wisconsin, on March 20, 1854.\u00a0 Anti-slavery sentiment was so strong in some northern and border states that the party was able to elect its first president, Abraham Lincoln, in 1860, just six years later.\u00a0 In the ensuing 104 years, Republicans fought what seemed an endless battle against Democrats who longed for the return of slavery and who opposed basic human rights for former slaves and their descendants.<\/p>\n A Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, signed the Emancipation Proclamation.<\/p>\n It was Republicans who drafted and passed the 13th<\/sup>, 14th<\/sup>, and 15th<\/sup> Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, outlawing slavery and giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote.<\/p>\n It was Democrat-controlled legislatures across the South who enacted the Black Codes and the Jim Crow laws.<\/p>\n In 1866, it was Democrats who created the Ku Klux Klan as a paramilitary arm of their party.\u00a0 Its purpose was to intimidate, terrorize, and murder black people.\u00a0 In the years between 1882 and 1951, some 3,437 blacks and 1,293 whites, nearly all Republicans, were lynched by the KKK.<\/p>\n It was Republicans who authored the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the Reconstruction Act of 1867, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, and the Civil Rights Act of 1875.<\/p>\n It was Democrats who wrote and passed the Repeal Act of 1894, repealing much of the civil rights legislation passed by Republicans in the years since the close of the Civil War.\u00a0 In other instances, a Democrat-dominated U.S. Supreme Court declared elements of the Republican civil rights legislation to be unconstitutional.<\/p>\n It was a Republican president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, who authored the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1960.\u00a0 Later, it was the strong support of Republicans that made the Civil Rights Act of 1964 possible\u2026 a law that was almost identical, word-for-word, to the Republicans\u2019 Civil Rights Act of 1875, overturned by a Democrat-dominated U.S. Supreme Court.\u00a0 And finally, it was a Republican president, Richard Nixon, who signed the Equal Employment Act of 1972.<\/p>\n It was not until the Brown vs. Board of Education<\/i> decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the mid-1950s that Democrats finally decided that, if they could no longer control blacks through violence and intimidation, they would have to buy their hearts, their minds, and their votes with an endless variety of social welfare programs.\u00a0 Since that time, and to their great discredit, blacks have turned their backs on the Republicans who worked so tirelessly and so valiantly on their behalf.\u00a0 Instead, they now cast more than 90% of their votes for white Democrats, those who were their oppressors for more than three centuries.\u00a0 Never in the history of man has a race of people shown such ingratitude toward those who were their principal benefactors.<\/p>\n But now it appears that a schism is beginning to develop in the black man\u2019s love affair with the Democrat Party.\u00a0 For the past sixty years, Democrats have been laying sloppy, slobbering kisses all over our black population.\u00a0 But what blacks are now learning is that, what they took to be undying love and devotion, was nothing more than a prelude to a cheap one-night stand.<\/p>\n Bernadette Lancelin, a black mother in Houston, apparently a former Obama supporter, recently found herself being interviewed by a Houston TV station.\u00a0 She said she was furious that Barack Obama wants to spend nearly $4 billion on Central American kids who\u2019ve entered the country illegally.\u00a0 She said, \u201cWhat about the kids here? \u00a0What about the kids here in our neighborhood? \u00a0And not just in our neighborhood, but in our country?\u00a0 All these (illegal immigrant) kids, really?\u00a0 Why can\u2019t they go back?\u201d\u00a0 She said, \u201cI\u2019m sorry that their parents are in poor living conditions or surroundings or whatever\u2019s going on out there. \u00a0I don\u2019t care. \u00a0I care about what\u2019s going on right here in my own back yard, my neighborhood.\u201d<\/p>\n Mychal Massie, a black writer and talk show host in Los Angeles, has said, \u201cI condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate (the Obamas) as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are.\u00a0 There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color\u2026 Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader.\u201d<\/p>\n She went on to say, \u201cHe is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed.\u00a0 Even by the low standard of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequaled.\u00a0 Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood.\u201d<\/p>\n In a July 14 editorial for Minuteman News<\/i>, titled \u201cDemocrats\u2019 New Trophy Wife,\u201d attorney A.J. Delgado writes, \u201cDemocrats have built a brand as the party willing to stand up for black Americans, but the amnesty push (for illegal Hispanic immigrants) shows what a false promise that was.\u00a0 The message to black voters is: \u2018Yes, your ancestors endured unimaginable hardships and helped build this country, and we said we\u2019d help you out.\u00a0 But now we have a new trophy wife.\u2019\u00a0 Meanwhile, the harm to African Americans is not limited to reduced wages, greater competition for jobs, and declining household incomes\u2026 now even the black history of suffering is being diluted.\u00a0 Liberal columnist and CNN pundit Sally Kohn penned a column last week arguing that the term \u2018illegal immigrant\u2019 is the same as the N-word.\u201d<\/p>\n If there is a silver lining in the current immigration crisis along our southern border, it is that a great many previously disinterested or complacent Americans are being awakened to the evils of Barack Obama and the Democrat Party.\u00a0 William Gheen, president of the Americans for Legal Immigration PAC predicts that, on the weekend of July 19-20, more than 300 protest rallies will take place in cities all across the country.\u00a0 He said, \u201cOur goal is to unify Americans of all races, political parties, and walks of life against the Obama-inspired illegal immigrant invasion.\u201d<\/p>\n What is finally beginning to dawn on African Americans is that Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and other Democrats have long taken them for granted\u2026 assuming that, once a black man is bought, he will stay bought.\u00a0 It is apparent that what Democrats are hoping is that Hispanics will become the most sought-after minority voting bloc.\u00a0 Add those votes to the black vote, the labor vote, and the public employee vote, along with the votes of trial lawyers, radical feminists, radical environmentalists, gays, lesbians, and transvestites, and they expect to have a winning coalition that will maintain them in power until the end of time.<\/p>\n Delgado likens the Democrats\u2019 current attitude toward blacks to the husband who leaves his wife after 30 years of marriage, saying, \u201cWe\u2019ve had a good run, honey, but I\u2019ve found someone new.\u201d\u00a0 He says, \u201cYes, black America\u2026 it\u2019s closing time and there\u2019s a younger, hotter version of you out there on the dance floor, and the Democrats are laying on the charm, slick one-liners, and cash to buy her affections\u2026 and votes.\u201d<\/p>\n But now, in a stroke of irony that not even Hollywood screen writers could have visualized, we find that it is a black president and a black attorney general who are most responsible for the fissures that are beginning to appear in the once-solid Democrat base.\u00a0 Yes, cracks are beginning to appear in the Democrats\u2019 foundation.\u00a0 For the good of mankind, let\u2019s all hope that Barry Farber\u2019s prediction comes true and that Obama and his criminal conspirators will be soon be accorded the ignominy they so richly deserve.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In a WorldNetDaily column of July 16, titled, \u201cWhy they won\u2019t let us talk to the illegal kids,\u201d talk radio pioneer Barry Farber suggested that, \u201cthe reason we in media are not allowed to talk to the children is that … Continue reading