The April 2, 2014 edition of National Review Online<\/i> contains a blockbuster story detailing the results of a widespread vote fraud investigation conducted by the North Carolina State Board of Elections. \u00a0In their review of the 2012 General Election, the board searched some 101,000,000 voter records in databases of 27 other states, using the same names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers of individuals who voted in the North Carolina General Election.<\/p>\n
What they found provides convincing proof that Democrats were not going to take any chances in 2012; they were not going to allow Mitt Romney to ruin Barack Obama\u2019s chances for a second term.\u00a0 What the study of the 2012 election shows is that <\/b>35,570 North Carolina voters shared the same first names, last names, and dates of birth with individuals registered to vote in other states.\u00a0 Another 765 North Carolina voters had the same first names, last names, birthdays, and final four digits of a Social Security number as those who voted in other states, stretching credulity to its absolute limits.\u00a0 <\/b>Barack Obama carried North Carolina in 2012 by a margin of just 14,177 votes (0.33%).\u00a0 To what extent were those voters residents of North Carolina who also voted in 27 other states, or were many of them residents of 27 other states who also voted in North Carolina?<\/p>\n
In another recent study by the State of Virginia, it was found that some 44,000 Virginia voters are also registered to vote in Maryland.\u00a0 Of course, fraudulent voting by Democrats is not unique to North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland.\u00a0 For Democrats, vote fraud is a way of life\u2026 standard operating procedure.\u00a0 And if the Republican Party had any leaders fit to be called leaders, they would see to it that the voting statistics of every state in the nation are evaluated in exactly the same way as the North Carolina voting age population.<\/p>\n
For starters, the North Carolina attorney general should hold a press conference, extending an invitation to the 765 North Carolinians with the same first names, last names, birth dates, and Social Security numbers as individuals who were found to have voted in other states to come forward and identify themselves.\u00a0 Those individuals should be allowed to plead guilty to felony vote fraud, pay a hefty fine, and lose their voting rights for a period as prescribed by law<\/p>\n
Of course, not all those who engage in vote fraud could be expected to self-identify themselves.\u00a0 In such cases, the North Carolina attorney general should conduct forensic examinations of absentee ballots held in North Carolina and other states, lifting latent fingerprints from absentee ballots and subjecting signatures to expert handwriting analysis.\u00a0 Those who fail to self-identify, but whose latent fingerprints are later found on absentee ballots should be indicted, tried, subject to a heavy fine, and sentenced to prison.\u00a0 Upon being sentenced for felony vote fraud they should also lose voting rights as prescribed by law.<\/p>\n
Federal law requires that all state election boards retain absentee ballots for at least twenty-two months following an election.\u00a0 Many states require ballots to be retained for twenty-four months, or longer.\u00a0 So it is essential that investigators conduct studies of double voting within two years following an election or much of the evidence of vote fraud will be destroyed.<\/p>\n
In a recent speech before Al Sharpton\u2019s National Action Network, Barack Obama attempted to rally his base by charging that Republicans are attempting to suppress the black vote in the coming 2014 General Election.\u00a0 Demonstrating once again that he is the dimmest bulb on the porch, he said, \u201cThe principle of one person-one vote is the single greatest tool we have to redress an unjust status quo.\u00a0 You would think there would not be an argument about this anymore.\u00a0 But the stark, simple truth is this:\u00a0 The right to vote is threatened today in a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights Act became law nearly five decades ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course, as is the case with almost everything Obama says, he was not speaking the truth; he was only saying what he thought would appeal to his low-information base. \u00a0The fact is, except for Democrat-sponsored fraud, the right to vote has not been threatened at all in recent decades, compared to the years between the Civil War and the mid-1950s.\u00a0 In those years Democrats used the KKK to intimidate and\/or murder thousands of blacks for no other reason than that they insisted on the right to vote.\u00a0 Yes, the one<\/i> person-one<\/i> vote principle is a critical concept in our system, but that means one<\/i> person-one<\/i> vote, not one<\/i> Republican-one<\/i> vote and one<\/i> Democrat-two<\/i> votes or three<\/i> votes, as most Democrats see as their birthright.<\/p>\n
He went on to say, \u201cAcross the country, Republicans have led efforts to pass laws making it harder, not easier, for people to vote\u2026\u201d\u00a0 So if that is a true statement, it must also be correct to say that Republicans have led efforts to make it impossible to board an airplane, to cash a check, to make purchases with credit cards, to enter public buildings, to sign up for food stamps, to sign up for unemployment benefits, and to purchase beer, wine, liquor, and cigarettes.\u00a0 But we all know that\u2019s not the case, so once again Obama is caught telling untruths to people who are either too dumb or too gullible to know that they\u2019re being propagandized by a four-Pinocchio liar.<\/p>\n
The truth is, since the vast majority of those behind prison bars are registered Democrats\u2026 those who\u2019ve either attempted to disrupt the social order or who\u2019ve attempted to enrich themselves at the expense of others\u2026 it is only fair to say that it is Democrats who are directly responsible for most of these impositions on our time and integrity.<\/p>\n
He said, \u201cNow, I want to be clear!\u00a0 I am not against reasonable attempts to secure the ballot.\u00a0 We understand that there has (sic) to be rules in place.\u00a0 But I am against requiring an ID that millions of Americans don\u2019t have.\u00a0 That shouldn\u2019t suddenly prevent you from exercising your right to vote.\u00a0 So, yes, we\u2019re right to be on guard against voter fraud.\u00a0 Voter fraud would impinge on our democracy, as well.\u00a0 We don’t want folks voting that shouldn\u2019t be voting.\u00a0 We all agree on that.\u00a0 Let\u2019s stipulate to that, as the lawyers say.\u201d<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, with an attorney general like Eric Holder, Obama can stipulate all he wants to.\u00a0 It means about as much as a doctor stipulating that a patient suffers from a terminal, but curable, disease, but then prescribes no course of treatment.\u00a0 Eric Holder has been handed irrefutable evidence of vote fraud crimes by Democrats, all of which have been filed in the \u201cround file.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then, suggesting to his gullible listeners that vote fraud is not a problem, he offered a few statistics.\u00a0\u00a0 He said, \u201cOne recent study found only 10 cases of alleged voter impersonation in 12 years\u2026 10 cases.\u00a0 Another analysis found that, out of 197 million votes cast for federal elections between 2002 and 2005, only 40 voters\u2026 out of 197 million\u2026 were indicted for fraud\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
Since a great many Democratic precincts regularly produce far more than ten cases of in-person voter impersonations, the people who put words on Obama\u2019s teleprompter must have searched long and hard to find a source that would attest to only 10 cases in the entire United States in a 12 year period.\u00a0 Since Obama failed to cite the source for his statistics, one might suspect that they came either from Eric Holder or from the PR office at the Democrat National Committee.<\/p>\n
It apparently escaped Obama\u2019s attention that, in 2012, in precincts all across the country, in major cities with heavy Democratic majorities and powerful Democratic machines, Mitt Romney was completely \u201cskunked,\u201d receiving not a single vote out of hundreds of thousands of votes cast.\u00a0 This, of course, is not only a statistical improbability, it is a statistical impossibility, but it went completely unchallenged by Romney and the Republican National Committee.<\/p>\n
Giving a tip-of-the-hat to a former racist Democrat president, Obama told his nearly all-black audience that, at the time Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, some of his advisors were recommending caution, saying, \u201cWell, all right, just wait.\u00a0 You\u2019ve done a big thing now; let\u2019s let the dust settle, don\u2019t stir folks up.\u201d\u00a0 But Obama quotes Johnson as replying, \u201cNo, no, I can\u2019t wait.\u00a0 We\u2019ve got to press forward and pass the Voting Rights Act.\u00a0 About this there can and should be no argument.\u00a0 Every American citizen must have an equal right to vote.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course, that represents only Obama\u2019s sanitized version of what Johnson may have said at the time. \u00a0According to two Democratic governors who flew with him on Air Force One, what LBJ actually said was, \u201cI\u2019ll have those n_ _ _ ers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.\u201d<\/p>\n
The point is, African-Americans are rarely told the truth about where white Democrats actually stand on the issue of race.\u00a0 If the Republican Party had leaders worthy of the title, they would begin to tell them the truth, treating them as if they are grownups.<\/p>\n
To the best of my knowledge, only one fraudulent voter in the entire state of Ohio went to jail for vote fraud in 2013.\u00a0 According to a story in the Cincinnati Enquirer<\/i>, Melowese Richardson was convicted of voting 5 times for Barack Obama in 2012.\u00a0 She was released on March 11, 2014, after serving only eight months of a five year sentence on the grounds that she is mentally ill\u2026 a condition not uncommon among Obama voters.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s long past time that Republicans moved forward with a national voter registration database, tying every registered voter to a name, address, birth date, and Social Security number.\u00a0 It\u2019s also long past time that we began making a lot more Melowese Richardsons, whether Democrats or Republicans.\u00a0 And if we don\u2019t have Republican leaders with the stomach for the task, then it\u2019s time to get new Republican leadership.\u00a0 We don\u2019t have to jail all Democrats who commit fraud\u2026 we could never build enough jail cells\u2026 we only have to jail enough of them to make the rest wonder if perhaps they\u2019ll be the next to hear a knock on their door.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The April 2, 2014 edition of National Review Online contains a blockbuster story detailing the results of a widespread vote fraud investigation conducted by the North Carolina State Board of Elections. \u00a0In their review of the 2012 General Election, the … Continue reading